blue News Logo
  • Start
  • Sport
  • Switzerland
  • International
  • Football
  • People
  • MyTech
  • Lifestyle
blue News Logo
  • Start
  • Sport
  • Switzerland
  • International
  • Football
  • People
  • MyTech
  • Lifestyle
blue NewsSwitzerlandInternationalSportFootballDigitalPeopleLifestyle
About blueOur CompanyWork at blueJobs
blue+blue TVblue Sportblue SuperMax
blue CinemaMoviesComing soonDealsMemberclubs
Residential CustomersMobileInternetTVCombi SubscriptionDevicesSupport & ServiceHelp
ToolsEmailCustomer SupportPhone BookShop Finder
blue News
SwitzerlandInternationalSportFootballDigitalPeopleLifestyle
About blue
Our CompanyWork at blueJobs
blue+
blue TVblue Sportblue SuperMax
blue Cinema
MoviesComing soonDealsMemberclubs
Residential Customers
MobileInternetTVCombi SubscriptionDevicesSupport & ServiceHelp
Tools
EmailCustomer SupportPhone BookShop Finder
AdvertisingLegalPrivacy PolicyImprintJournalistic Guidelinesblue News AppFAQ
DEFRITEN
DEFRITEN
Greenland dispute: Trump's government contradicts itself
HomeChevron rightNewsChevron rightInternational

Found an error?

Report now

Inconsistent Greenland course

Attack? Purchase? Trump administration sends completely contradictory signals

President Donald Trump speaks to Republican members of the House of Representatives during their annual retreat. Photo: Evan Vucci/AP/dpa

President Donald Trump speaks to Republican members of the House of Representatives during their annual retreat. Photo: Evan Vucci/AP/dpa

Keystone

In the dispute over Greenland, the White House is talking openly about a possible military deployment - while Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Republican Speaker Mike Johnson are publicly rowing back. The Trump administration's course looks increasingly inconsistent.

Keystone-SDA

Keystone-SDA

07.01.2026, 01:21•07.01.2026, 08:57

No time? blue News summarizes for you

  • Trump's spokeswoman explicitly mentions the deployment of the US military in the Greenland dispute as an option.
  • Secretary of State Marco Rubio qualifies this a little later: the aim is a purchase, not an invasion.
  • There is also opposition from Congress - Speaker Mike Johnson rejects a military deployment.
Summary created withmyAi

The US government under President Donald Trump is sending contradictory signals in the dispute over Greenland. While government spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt openly describes the deployment of the US military as a possible option, other central figures in the administration are trying to recapture the escalation.

Leavitt explained that the president and his team were looking at "a range of options" to bring Greenland under US control. "Of course, the use of the US military is always an option available to the commander-in-chief," she said. At the same time, she emphasized that it was a "national security priority" of the United States - also with regard to Russia and China in the Arctic.

Contradictions from within her own ranks

However, this was followed shortly afterwards by a different interpretation from Washington. According to theWall Street Journal, Secretary of State Marco Rubio qualified the statements in talks with US MPs.

According to him, the public threats should not be interpreted as a military invasion. Instead, it was still about a possible purchase of Greenland - a project that Trump had already brought into play during his first term in office.

Additional distance came from the US Congress. The Republican Chairman of the House of Representatives, Mike Johnson, said that a military operation to take over Greenland was "not appropriate". He had not recently held any talks with Trump on this topic.

Teaser image

Scandinavian countries fight back

Trump has not forgotten Greenland and still wants the island "absolutely"

The actual line on the Greenland issue therefore remains increasingly unclear. The White House is threatening to use military force, while the State Department and now even Congress are resorting to diplomacy in an attempt to limit the damage.

The European states united behind Greenland on Tuesday. Only Denmark and Greenland would decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland, according to a statement signed by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. "Greenland belongs to its people."

More About this Topic

Because of the war with Iran
Because of the war with Iran

Farmers' Association President Sounds the Alarm: Fertilizer Is Becoming Increasingly Scarce

"It's absolutely terrible"
"It's absolutely terrible"

Major Fire in Norway Destroys More Than 100 Homes

Update Follows
A New Beginning or a Crisis?
A New Beginning or a Crisis?

What the dismissal of Defense Minister Fedorov Means for Ukraine

It doesn't get any more brazen than this
It doesn't get any more brazen than this

While his case is being heard, the defendant breaks into several banks

Most Read

1Major Fire in Norway Destroys More Than 100 Homes
2Why Everyone Is Suddenly Against Argentina
3All-clear after massive power outage in Seeland